Hi! On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:13:47PM +0200, silverdr@inet.com.pl wrote: > >Great user support - as always :-) > > Ditto! ;-) Thanks. > A small question/suggestion: wouldn't it be worth migrating the code > repository to SVN and setting up read-only access for anonymous users? > I know it's not a trivial task, when there is an automated build > system scripted around CVS but probably not _that_ difficult too, and > in the long run it would IMHO be more "future-proof" and would > certainly help all the users in keeping up to date when needed and > "down to date" when something gets wrong with the bleeding edge version. I'm introduced SVN at the place where I'm currently working, and I'm quite happy with it. Especially the windows client, TortoiseSVN, is a really cool piece of software. I don't know if there is a similar thing for Linux but I sure hope so. Importing CVS archives is a snap using cvs2svn. So yes, I've already thought about a change myself. Converting the build script is rather easy - it does nothing more than checking if there are changes between now and the time of the last run. If there are changes, it checks out the complete head branch and starts the build. The two CVS operations are easy to "translate" into SVN. So let's see what happens:-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Mar 31 20:13:48 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-03-31 20:13:49 CEST