Re: [cc65] Compiler Bug (?)

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <>
Date: 2008-03-31 20:16:06

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:31:30AM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> The former is not a requirement for the latter.  I know that
> Subversion is better than CVS in pretty much every way, and is the
> heir apparent to the open source version control crown for that
> reason, but you can set up anonymous readonly access to a CVS
> repository with significantly less work than migrating the whole thing
> to SVN.

Having anonymous and non anonymous access to a CVS archive is inherently
insecure. This was the reason why I've decided against the former. SVN is
pretty secure when used via a web server using DAV. So if I will change
anything, SVN is probably the way to go.



Ullrich von Bassewitz                        
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Mon Mar 31 20:16:18 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-03-31 20:16:20 CEST