Hi! On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:25:26PM +0100, Gábor Lénárt wrote: > A - maybe not too related - question: does it make any sense to support > other CPUs, like DTV's "CPU" (not counting the undocumented - but sometimes > incorrect - opcodes, only three afaik: BRA/SAC/SIR), and 65CE02? For the DTV it's probably not worth the trouble, since usage is rare and the additional instructions can easily be added by using macros. The DTV extended memory driver that comes with cc65 does completely without these instructions. The 65CE02 is as far as I know the CPU of the C65. There are probably a few hundred chips in existence world wide, most of these machines are just collectors items and not really used. So I would say it's even less worth the trouble. > I am not sure if "none" CPU is supported now (we talked about that too): not > having any opcodes etc, can be useful when you "compose" only data, so there > are no reserved keywords (I can use macros like LDA, etc) in that case. For > sure, that's the most easy to implement :) The "none" CPU is supported, but as far as I know, no one has ever used it:-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 9 22:55:42 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-02-09 22:55:46 CET