Hi, On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:55:30PM +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:25:26PM +0100, Gábor Lénárt wrote: > > A - maybe not too related - question: does it make any sense to support > > other CPUs, like DTV's "CPU" (not counting the undocumented - but sometimes > > incorrect - opcodes, only three afaik: BRA/SAC/SIR), and 65CE02? > > For the DTV it's probably not worth the trouble, since usage is rare and the > additional instructions can easily be added by using macros. The DTV extended > memory driver that comes with cc65 does completely without these instructions. Indeed, for myself, I use macros, so probably it does not worth to have a new CPU type just for three extra opcodes. :) And I spoke only opcodes now, not the std library/etc/whatever. > > The 65CE02 is as far as I know the CPU of the C65. There are probably a few > hundred chips in existence world wide, most of these machines are just > collectors items and not really used. So I would say it's even less worth the > trouble. At least I am interested in, to be honest :) But ok, if I need it, at least I can do it for myself. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 9 23:00:32 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-02-09 23:00:35 CET