Hi, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:00:42PM +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > Ok. Version 2.13.3 is out: Thanks :) I really like cc65/ca65/ld65. Thanks for the work you did and hopefully will do in the future too :) About the assembler: A - maybe not too related - question: does it make any sense to support other CPUs, like DTV's "CPU" (not counting the undocumented - but sometimes incorrect - opcodes, only three afaik: BRA/SAC/SIR), and 65CE02? I just ask this, because implementing that is not so hard, maybe I can do it (yes, maybe you can remember that I promised some Z80 support: it seems it can be harder - for me at least - than I inmagined), but I am curious that this patch is worth to try to be made at all, ie will it be accepted by you. I am not sure if "none" CPU is supported now (we talked about that too): not having any opcodes etc, can be useful when you "compose" only data, so there are no reserved keywords (I can use macros like LDA, etc) in that case. For sure, that's the most easy to implement :) --- - Gábor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Feb 8 15:25:33 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-02-08 15:25:36 CET