Re: [cc65] C64 fast-loader suggestion?

From: Groepaz <>
Date: 2011-12-11 19:35:32
On Sunday 11 December 2011, you wrote:
> I agree with groepaz: cbm_load etc. have less overhead then fread etc.,
> because they are much closer to the KERNAL stuff. But however, these
> work too ;)
> To come back to the initial question:
> Let me mention that my loader makes it simple to mix fast load and
> KERNAL functions. The drive code exits as soon as eload_close() is
> called. The ATN line is used to stop the drive code, so after a
> C64-reset the first disk operation usually exits it too. However I'm
> quite sure that Krills loader has a similar feature.

yes, it also has kernal fallback.


Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. 
<Alan Braggins>

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Dec 11 19:35:40 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-12-11 19:35:43 CET