Re: [cc65] C64 fast-loader suggestion?

From: Thomas Giesel <skoe1directbox.com>
Date: 2011-12-11 19:23:10
I agree with groepaz: cbm_load etc. have less overhead then fread etc.,
because they are much closer to the KERNAL stuff. But however, these
work too ;)

To come back to the initial question:
Let me mention that my loader makes it simple to mix fast load and
KERNAL functions. The drive code exits as soon as eload_close() is
called. The ATN line is used to stop the drive code, so after a
C64-reset the first disk operation usually exits it too. However I'm
quite sure that Krills loader has a similar feature.

Skoe

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Dec 11 19:23:20 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-12-11 19:23:22 CET