Hi! On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:33:46AM +0100, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > Currently yes, but I'm by no means insisting in doing so. But this > leads to the question why the cc65 conio library is doing so if this > approach has the downsides we're discussing here. Is it about > compatibility? Or code size? Or has just nobody so far invested the > time to implement a "custom keyscanner"? Using a custom keyboard scanner is in my eyes far beyond the scope of cc65. More than 99% of all programs don't use a mouse. Without a mouse there are no problems. This is one side. The other is that there are custom kernals that support a changed keyboard layout. Using such a kernal with a custom keyboard scanner will actually disable it. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Feb 3 16:52:31 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-02-03 16:52:33 CET