Re: [cc65] Secondary linker configurations

From: Groepaz <>
Date: 2009-09-25 17:31:56
On Freitag 25 September 2009, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> > Having more than one library *is* complicating things. It won't matter
> > for most people, but for some, it will.
> Sorry for still not having fully understand ld65 after all these years,
> but...
> Would it be feasable to have "extra libs" instead of "extra objects":
> Libs to be placed on the ld65 cmdline before the "normal" target lib,
> containing alternative implementations of certain functions.
> Wouldn't that already solve Groepaz' usecase while still keeping the
> paradigm of "the" C- / runtime-library of the "normal" case ?!?

it should, in theory. in practise i always had problems with that approach, i 
always had to remove the objects that i want to "overload" from c64.lib, or 
else it would link *some* stuff against the wrong objects.


If only God would give me a clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name 
at a Swiss bank. 
<Woody Allen>

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Sep 25 17:32:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-25 17:32:07 CEST