Re: [cc65] Secondary linker configurations

From: Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc1web.de>
Date: 2009-09-25 17:20:28
Hi,

> Having more than one library *is* complicating things. It won't matter for
> most people, but for some, it will.

Sorry for still not having fully understand ld65 after all these years, but...

Would it be feasable to have "extra libs" instead of "extra objects":
Libs to be placed on the ld65 cmdline before the "normal" target lib,
containing alternative implementations of certain functions.

Wouldn't that already solve Groepaz' usecase while still keeping the
paradigm of "the" C- / runtime-library of the "normal" case ?!?

Best, Oliver
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Sep 25 17:20:34 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-25 17:20:36 CEST