Re: [cc65] New subversion source code repository

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2008-08-03 15:03:12
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 02:38:45PM +0200, silverdr@inet.com.pl wrote:
> Bingo - that means also that Joe The Ordinary won't have to re-
> download and recompile every full snapshot.

Most users (especially Windows users) are probably glad not to have to
recompile the sources themselves:-)

> My guess would be that those would tags on the main branch but
> probably this comes from your legacy structures, right?

No. Here is a layout sample of the repository:

  trunk
    ^
    |   branches/version-2.12/trunk
    |               ^
    |               |
    |               +-----------> branches/version-2.12/tags/version-2.12.1
    |               |
    |               |
    +---------------+-----------> branches/version-2.12/tags/version-2.12.0
    :
    :
    :
    |   branches/version-2.11/trunk
    |               ^
    |               |
    |               +-----------> branches/version-2.11/tags/version-2.11.1
    |               |
    |               |
    +---------------+-----------> branches/version-2.11/tags/version-2.11.0
    |
    :

That means: For a major release, the trunk is branched into the branches
directory with a new trunk. This branch is then tagged for the different minor
releases.

> This doesn't seem like a SVN repository problem but the checked out
> trunk sources don't build ATM here:

This is caused by changes in the compiler. Things like this may also happen
with the snapshot. The C standard says that a label must always be followed by
a statement. The _scanf.c source violated this rule, but older versions of the
compiler didn't complain. So in fact the _scanf.c file has been broken before,
but it went unnoticed.

Thanks for the feedback!

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Aug 3 15:03:21 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-08-03 15:03:24 CEST