Re: [cc65] New subversion source code repository

On 2008-08-03, at 15:03, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:

>
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 02:38:45PM +0200, silverdr@inet.com.pl wrote:
>> Bingo - that means also that Joe The Ordinary won't have to re-
>> download and recompile every full snapshot.
>
> Most users (especially Windows users) are probably glad not to have to
> recompile the sources themselves:-)
>

:-D Yes, thank you for reminding me that I have distorted view on the  
reality. I often tend forget this.


>> My guess would be that those would tags on the main branch but
>> probably this comes from your legacy structures, right?
>
> No. Here is a layout sample of the repository:

[...]

> That means: For a major release, the trunk is branched into the  
> branches
> directory with a new trunk. This branch is then tagged for the  
> different minor
> releases.

I see - that explains and in fact makes good sense. I didn't check the  
nested structure in the older versions.

>> This doesn't seem like a SVN repository problem but the checked out
>> trunk sources don't build ATM here:
>
> This is caused by changes in the compiler. Things like this may also  
> happen
> with the snapshot. The C standard says that a label must always be  
> followed by
> a statement. The _scanf.c source violated this rule, but older  
> versions of the
> compiler didn't complain. So in fact the _scanf.c file has been  
> broken before,
> but it went unnoticed.

And the great part is that I already see that you added a couple of  
semicolons to fix this :-)

Cordially,

P.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.