Re: [cc65] New subversion source code repository

On 2008-08-03, at 13:41, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:

>
> I've converted the current CVS repository used to manage the cc65  
> sources into
> a subversion repository. This means:
>
>  * It is now possible to have read and write access together without  
> fear of
>    security breaches.

Bingo - that means also that Joe The Ordinary won't have to re- 
download and recompile every full snapshot.


>  * Consequently, there's now read access for (almost) everybody.  
> Provided
>    that your host has a valid DNS name, you can access the  
> repository using
>
>        svn://svn.cc65.org/

After adding 'cc65/' works perfectly well.

>    The current development version is in trunk/, branches/ contains  
> older
>    versions. PLEASE AVOID DOWNLOADING THE WHOLE REPOSITORY INTO A  
> WORKING
>    COPY BECAUSE THIS GENERATES LOTS OF DATA AND TRAFFIC. If this  
> feature is
>    abused, I will have to block access to older versions as I did  
> with the
>    ftp server.

My guess would be that those would tags on the main branch but  
probably this comes from your legacy structures, right?

> [...]
>
> If there are problems, please let me know.

This doesn't seem like a SVN repository problem but the checked out  
trunk sources don't build ATM here:

[...]
ar65: Warning: Library `apple2.lib' not found - will be created
_scanf.c(218): Error: Label at end of compound statement
_scanf.c(265): Error: Label at end of compound statement
_scanf.c(295): Error: Label at end of compound statement
_scanf.c(411): Error: Label at end of compound statement
make[3]: *** [_scanf.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [apple2lib] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
make: *** [libs] Error 2

I am pointing this out because I am not sure if it is a known problem  
of the development branch or something else.

Best regards and thanks for this change.

P.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.