Hello Uz, rethinking about this, I come to another conclusion: * On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:00:47AM +0200 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:42:19AM +0200, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > > > * Is it worth the trouble to install several different versions at one time? > > > Or the snapshot in parallel with a stable version? > > > > Yes, it is. In some cases, you want to compare the behaviour of > > different versions to each other. Or you want to install the newest > > version, but as you do not know if it has new bugs, you want to keep > > your "working good" one. > > Ok, but in this generality it has rather severe consequences: You will always > have to uninstall manually because the old version are not recognized as "old" > but as "different". Not adding the directories to PATH will cause trouble with > unexperienced users. This might not be worth it, ... > Regarding the installation as normal user: Since I don't want to spent another > week on this problem, I will probably require admin rights for now. This can > be changed for later versions, once there is some feedback. ... as well as this one, if: > > Another thing: Please, allow anyone who wants to install cc65 to do so > > without the installer - that is, make it optional, not mandatory. > > I have no plans to drop the ZIP files. This is still possible. That is: Make the installer only install one version of cc65 at all is o.k. if the "Power Users" ;) are able to install additional versions from the ZIP files. This might be much easier, isn't it? Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Apr 20 11:05:44 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-04-20 11:05:45 CEST