On Friday 22 October 2004 20:58, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > There are two reasons for the makefile not being in the top level directory: > The first one is that there is more than one makefile. Cluttering the top > level directory with lots of different makefiles would not help anyone. The > second reason is that I'm trying in general to keep the top level directory > clean. I have refused to add special Debian subdirectories, or the RedHat spec > file to the top level dir (so that the package can be built with -t). well yes i understand what your reasons are.... i still kindof expect to find things like a toplevel makefile and a readme in the toplevel directory of every sourcetree > I'm > really wondering why everyone thinks that exactly his file/directory is so > important that is has to be on top of anything else. hehe :) maybe a readme that tells where the files are and why there are there would clear up things once and for ever :) not that this is a big issue...but hey :=P a few more ppl might be able to actually locate the docs or the examples or whatever :) gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Oct 25 08:52:47 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-10-25 08:52:58 CEST