Re: [cc65] Apple2 Libraries - Current status of file io ?

Hi,

> On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:49:09AM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> > I would opt - as always - for dynamic runtime checking of the OS running
on.
> > But I'm quite sure that Ullrich won't like that - as always - because of
the
> > C library blow-up ;-)
>
> If I hear the complaints that not enough memory is available to run a
flash
> plugin for Contiki, I think that my concerns about code size are
justified,
> aren't they? :-)

Please note the ' ;-)' above... BTW: In my oppinion gif support would be
hard enough, but flash ???

> See my library proposal in the other mail.

Which looks just great to me :-))

> Would it be possible to separate
> the code so cleanly that using two or more disk I/O libs could solve the
> problem?

As fas as I can see: Yes.

> There can be references from the main code into the disk I/O
> libraries, but the interface needs to be the same for all of them.

As fas as I understand this would be quite easy as they don't share code
anyway but both need to implement the APIs for the stream based stuff
anyway - or do I miss a point here?

> Since using constructors for initialization is also an option, I think
this
> should work (provided that the linker is able to handle it).

Again I agree.

Oliver

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.