Re: [cc65] Apple2 Libraries - Current status of file io ?

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2004-07-29 09:54:11
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:49:09AM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> I would opt - as always - for dynamic runtime checking of the OS running on.
> But I'm quite sure that Ullrich won't like that - as always - because of the
> C library blow-up ;-)

If I hear the complaints that not enough memory is available to run a flash
plugin for Contiki, I think that my concerns about code size are justified,
aren't they? :-)

> Another target would mean no ProDOS support for the 6502 machines - wouldn't
> it?

See my library proposal in the other mail. Would it be possible to separate
the code so cleanly that using two or more disk I/O libs could solve the
problem? There can be references from the main code into the disk I/O
libraries, but the interface needs to be the same for all of them.

Since using constructors for initialization is also an option, I think this
should work (provided that the linker is able to handle it).

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Thu Jul 29 09:54:15 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-07-29 09:54:23 CEST