On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:17:11AM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > > If I hear the complaints that not enough memory is available to run a flash > > plugin for Contiki, I think that my concerns about code size are justified, > > aren't they? :-) > > Please note the ' ;-)' above... BTW: In my oppinion gif support would be > hard enough, but flash ??? Please note the ':-)' above:-) > As fas as I understand this would be quite easy as they don't share code > anyway but both need to implement the APIs for the stream based stuff > anyway - or do I miss a point here? The stream bases stuff (FILE*) is platform independent. It just calls the POSIX compatible functions that need to be implemented by the platform layer. So it should be possible to supply these functions in a separate library, but as usual, there may be a few problematic details once someone starts implementing it. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Jul 29 10:40:24 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-07-29 10:40:33 CEST