Re: [cc65] Overflows in signed comparisions

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-10-07 15:33:55 

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:54:39AM +0200, Groepaz wrote:
> its not an overflow i think, rather a real serious bug :=P i added some of
> sdcc's regression tests to the testsuite last nite (and i hope i'll manage to
> get the rest added this nite) and all the tests which involve signed
> comparisons do fail :=P

And didn't find the time to look at the test suite - sorry.

> i think to be more precise, and to avoid confusion it should say something
> like
>
> "C functions can not take structs as parameters by value. Structs can not be
> returned by value. Struct assignment is possible."

Which is still wrong, since assembler functions *can* return structs by value,
provided they have a size of 1, 2 or 4 bytes :-)

> ...oh, and the vic-20 is missing in the list of supported targets :O)

Ok, thanks!

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-10-07 15:36:53 CEST