From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-10-08 00:14:51
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 15:33, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:54:39AM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > > its not an overflow i think, rather a real serious bug :=P i added some > > of sdcc's regression tests to the testsuite last nite (and i hope i'll > > manage to get the rest added this nite) and all the tests which involve > > signed comparisons do fail :=P > > And didn't find the time to look at the test suite - sorry. no problem :=) just trying to make it run all through without getting stuck at certain tests, so the only required interaction is closing the emu when everything is done :) (still thinking about some whacked up patch to x64 so the program can close the emu .... ) > > i think to be more precise, and to avoid confusion it should say > > something like > > > > "C functions can not take structs as parameters by value. Structs can not > > be returned by value. Struct assignment is possible." > > Which is still wrong, since assembler functions *can* return structs by > value, provided they have a size of 1, 2 or 4 bytes :-) woha....and that doesnt make it exactly less confusing either :=P however it should be made clear in the docs :) gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-10-08 00:22:49 CEST