From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-10-07 15:31:19
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 09:41:03PM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > however, (in theory) there _is_ a irq handling api - see signal.h :=) all it > takes is implementing "alarm" for example, and then you can have timer > interupts (if the signal api works with c-code as signal handler that is, > didnt check that :=)) I do still think that writing interrupt handlers in C is a bad idea because of the overhead involved, and because most people don't realize that you can do almost nothing in a signal handler, besides storing something into a variable of type sig_atomic_t. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-10-07 15:34:17 CEST