Re: [cc65] how about commercial prgs?

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: MagerValp (MagerValp_at_cling.gu.se)
Date: 2002-04-02 14:27:49 

>>>>> "UvB" == Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz_at_musoftware.de> writes:

UvB> For me this reads: If GPLed code is linked statically to the cc65
UvB> library, and distributed as a whole (as a program binary for
UvB> example), the whole (executable) must be on the terms of the GPL,
UvB> including the parts that were not GPLed before. The latter is
UvB> actually a violation of the cc65 copyright, because it does
UvB> relicense parts of the cc65 library without agreement of the
UvB> author.

But there are several GPL projects that statically link to libz, which
is BSD licensed...

-- 
    ___          .     .  .         .       . +  .         .      o   
  _|___|_   +   .  +     .     +         .  Per Olofsson, arkadspelare
    o-o    .      .     .   o         +          MagerValp_at_cling.gu.se
     -       +            +    .     http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl3polof/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-04-02 14:31:16 CEST