Re: [cc65] how about commercial prgs?

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Mike McCarty (jmccarty_at_ssd.usa.alcatel.com)
Date: 2002-04-02 18:24:31


On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, MagerValp wrote:

> >>>>> "UvB" == Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz_at_musoftware.de> writes:
> 
> UvB> For me this reads: If GPLed code is linked statically to the cc65
> UvB> library, and distributed as a whole (as a program binary for
> UvB> example), the whole (executable) must be on the terms of the GPL,
> UvB> including the parts that were not GPLed before. The latter is
> UvB> actually a violation of the cc65 copyright, because it does
> UvB> relicense parts of the cc65 library without agreement of the
> UvB> author.
> 
> But there are several GPL projects that statically link to libz, which
> is BSD licensed...

I saw last week where a convenience store got robbed. I guess it must be
ok to do that.

Mike
-- 
char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I don't speak for Alcatel      <- They make me say that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.


Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-04-02 18:25:25 CEST