From: groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2002-02-15 11:12:52
Hello Ullrich, Thursday, February 14, 2002, 10:42:29 PM, you wrote: UvB> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:06:00PM +0100, groepaz wrote: >> ok... just hacked some kind character test crap proggy.... while you >> are at it, add these .... :o) UvB> These two are ok and I will add them: >> _ 0x5f 0xaf >> | 0x7c 0x7d UvB> But I'm not sure about the others. Is it really a good idea to map the UvB> backslash to the forward slash, i thought atleast mapping the backslash to _something_ more readable than it is now would make sence..... the way its now kinda sux ;/ i also thought that mapping a character to another one which is already used may introduce other problems, thats why i suggested the back-arrow for the backslash as alternative.... UvB> and some other characters to line drawing UvB> characters? it'd work much better in uppercase-petscii actually (you have a backslash there and also characters that kindof represent the tilde and curly braces...... no lowercase letters then ofcoz ;D) UvB> Please note that I'm not saying that it is a bad idea (I'm not UvB> sure about it), I'm just trying not to be hasty. i guess we should simply evaluate what kinda problems it could trigger.... if there are potentially none, there shouldnt be a reason not to do it :o) (and ofcoz, if it'd just introduce other nasty problems at another point, please do NOT do it ;=P) whatever, couldnt you just introduce a #pragma or sth for the compiler so anyone can handle that crap like he wants themselves? #pragma charmap 0x20 0x60 /* replace spaces by shift-spaces */ sth like that? -- Best regards, groepaz mailto:groepaz_at_gmx.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-02-15 11:13:31 CET