Hi Uz, >> If these programs are what you measure cc65 against then this is of >> course a showstopper. > > It's me who has to answer all the "why doesn't this work" questions. This > might influence my opinion:-) The approach described in my recent posting (enable the runtime / C library to run both with KERNAL banked in / banked out, bank out the KERNAL only by user request and leave the "usual" stuff incl software stack below $C000) would take care of that... >> Anyway I don't believe that there's a momentum to change the exsisting >> c64 target so the question is if linear RAM up to $FFF9 is worth the >> effort to create an maintain an additional target. > > There's not even a maintainer for the current C64 target, remember? Not going for linear RAM but staying with a custom segment (see above) might be a way to avoid creating yet another target. Regards, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 14 21:06:49 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-02-14 21:06:52 CET