Hi! On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:49:50PM +0100, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > > Almost no code written by cc65 beginners will work. What I have seen from > > posts here and in the web, people start using short programs which increment > > $D020 or call BSOUT via inline assembler, either because they come from BASIC > > or from assembler. And none of this stuff will work any more. > > If these programs are what you measure cc65 against then this is of > course a showstopper. It's me who has to answer all the "why doesn't this work" questions. This might influence my opinion:-) > Anyway I don't believe that there's a momentum to change the exsisting > c64 target so the question is if linear RAM up to $FFF9 is worth the > effort to create an maintain an additional target. There's not even a maintainer for the current C64 target, remember? Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 14 17:32:32 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-02-14 17:32:35 CET