On 2013-02-14, at 01:35, Groepaz wrote: >>>> I have similar feelings as Spiro. If the c64 platform is changed, it >>>> doesn't make sense to bank out just the kernal. Banking out I/O also is >>>> not much worse, but has the advantage of giving linear memory. >>> >>> I see. My reading on C64 memory layout options didn't reveal that >>> option. Otherwise I'd probably proposed it in the first place. >> >> On a 64 banking out the I/O is usually done as "last resort" when running >> out of mem, therefore it didn't strike me that you were not proposing it >> as first thing to do. But for a compiled programs it may well be the case. I noticed I didn't finish the sentence. I wanted to write that "for compiled programs it may well be the best case (as there are no mind jobs needed) to bank I/O as well or even first" > imho the reason for that is though that so many people are afraid of the > implications, and so few understand how to setup a proper interrupt handler > that works regardless of i/o being banked in or not. once you made this > happen, there really is little reason NOT to bank it out. No disagreement - full ACK. -- SD!---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 14 03:50:03 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-02-14 03:50:06 CET