On Thursday 14 February 2013, you wrote: > On 2013-02-13, at 23:49, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > >> I have similar feelings as Spiro. If the c64 platform is changed, it > >> doesn't make sense to bank out just the kernal. Banking out I/O also is > >> not much worse, but has the advantage of giving linear memory. > > > > I see. My reading on C64 memory layout options didn't reveal that > > option. Otherwise I'd probably proposed it in the first place. > > On a 64 banking out the I/O is usually done as "last resort" when running > out of mem, therefore it didn't strike me that you were not proposing it > as first thing to do. But for a compiled programs it may well be the case. imho the reason for that is though that so many people are afraid of the implications, and so few understand how to setup a proper interrupt handler that works regardless of i/o being banked in or not. once you made this happen, there really is little reason NOT to bank it out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 14 01:34:51 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-02-14 01:34:55 CET