Re: [cc65] Filenames for POSIX functins on CBM targets

Hi,

I think it's time to summarize - and as OP it's probably up to me to do so:

First of all I'd like to thank verybody who contributed to this
discussion. I really appreciate the factual style :-)

I'd say it's clear that among the participants there's no momentum to
create a pathname syntax for the CBM implementation of open() - just
as Uz predicted. Nevertheless at least for me it was worth the effort
to have it discussed "to the end".

In contrast most participats even consider even the current processing
of drive specifiers ("0:", "1:") as undesirable. Maybe Uz will remove
it based on this input.

Looking forward to me the next logical step is to discuss the options
for cross-target device and file-location handling. I'll start another
thread for doing so and hope that you're not too fed up by now ;-)

Regards,
Oliver
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.