On 2012-08-12, at 21:29, Groepaz wrote: >>> Looking at the whole discussion, I am getting more and more to the >>> conclusion that open() should probably just pass that name directly to >>> the os. >> >> Taking that seriously the current code that adds "0:" if it doesn't >> recognize a drive specification would need to be removed. Otherwise >> i.e. instead of "abc.txt" the file "0:abc.txt" would be written to the >> tape drive... > > it should be removed indeed - it causes more problems than it solves. I second that. I definitely don't like lib stuff messing with my filenames ;-) -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Aug 13 00:59:08 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-13 00:59:11 CEST