Re: [cc65] Filenames for POSIX functins on CBM targets

From: <silverdr1wfmh.org.pl>
Date: 2012-08-13 00:58:53
On 2012-08-12, at 21:29, Groepaz wrote:

>>> Looking at the whole discussion, I am getting more and more to the
>>> conclusion that open() should probably just pass that name directly to
>>> the os.
>> 
>> Taking that seriously the current code that adds "0:" if it doesn't
>> recognize a drive specification would need to be removed. Otherwise
>> i.e. instead of "abc.txt" the file "0:abc.txt" would be written to the
>> tape drive...
> 
> it should be removed indeed - it causes more problems than it solves.

I second that. I definitely don't like lib stuff messing with my filenames ;-)
-- 
SD!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Mon Aug 13 00:59:08 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-13 00:59:11 CEST