On 08/10/2012 03:10 PM, A.Fachat wrote: > I agree with the general concept. > > Just... grumble... my xd2031 drive (xs1541 firmware) supports up to 9 > drives in a unit... so try not to restrict that, its annoying enough > that cbm basic 4 restricts its drive number: DIR D1 works, DIR D7 not... > > Besides, what speaks against using the colon ":" as separator as is > done in the cbm drives? > > For example > > open("8#0:name", ... > > Could open "name" on drive 0 on unit 8. And you could even ignore the > drive number in the libc, as it is parsed by the drive itself. Sorry > if I have missed this part. > > André > -- > Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail > gesendet. This sounds best to me so far. "unit#drive:name" would be used on devices with the concept of "unit". "drive:name" would work for "drives". For the Lynx this would then be "0:0" to "0:4095" for accessing the files on rom0. More complex uses would then be like: "2:\\Program Files\\World of Warcraft\\Wow.exe" right? -- Karri ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Aug 10 14:48:25 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-10 14:48:28 CEST