Hi, > Besides, what speaks against using the colon ":" as separator as is done in > the cbm drives? That was just a mistake of mine - thanks for pointing out :-) Okay - I seem to understand that: - The number range of drives may overlap with the number range of units - At least some guys say that specifying drives isn't that popular From these two facts one could come to this conclusion: "A drive may only be specified together with a unit." This would mean: "4:abc.txt" means unit 4. "4:6:abc.txt means unit 4 drive 6. The parser for this scheme would even be somewhat simple than for the one I suggested before. All these thoughts based on the presumption that there isn no second char beside ':' that can be reserved for unit separation purposes. Regards, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:44:23 +0200
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-10 14:44:38 CEST