Hi Uz, >>> To make this even easier, I've moved the "_filetype" variable into a separate >>> module that contains nothing else. >> >> That's sort of a prerequisite of my proposal. > > Not necessarily. One could have replaced the module that contained _filetype > and the other variables. Surely, that's why I wrote "sort of". But if you would be willing to supply the module in question you'd most likely agree with me that it is desirable to "overlay" only the symbol in question… >> The question now is if >> an additional module (or even two) with a different value is placed in >> an 'extra' directory. > > I don't know if I understand that correctly, but at least I will not supply > any additional modules. I don't consider the whole thing important enough. > Not even after a mega discussion like the one we had:-) You understood me right. And I'm not surprised. It just seemed a way to give the discussion a more constructive direction because I could imagine that you could be convinced to supply the module in question with good arguments. I personally am not interested in such a module. …over an out… Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Jul 16 08:27:41 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-07-16 08:27:45 CEST