Hi Groepaz, > how is PRG cbm specific? and why would SEQ be better? they are *exactly the > same* - except for that one byte in the directory that makes it SEQ or PRG > >> Maybe I'm missing an important point but from the arguments I >> understand so far the decision seem easy to me. > > point: PRG is used in most cases. there is no backdraw in using prg. > > did someone already add to the confusion that SEQ files usually are expected > to contain petscii text, not arbitrary dats? =P Okay, trying to summarize what I've learned so far: There's basically not functional difference between SEQ and PRG. _Programatically_ everything can be done with everyone. It's all _only_ about human perception - correct? Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Jul 6 18:47:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-07-06 18:47:04 CEST