Re: [cc65] Common macros for dirent.d_type

From: Oliver Schmidt <>
Date: 2012-07-06 18:46:32
Hi Groepaz,

> how is PRG cbm specific? and why would SEQ be better? they are *exactly the
> same* - except for that one byte in the directory that makes it SEQ or PRG
>> Maybe I'm missing an important point but from the arguments I
>> understand so far the decision seem easy to me.
> point: PRG is used in most cases. there is no backdraw in using prg.
> did someone already add to the confusion that SEQ files usually are expected
> to contain petscii text, not arbitrary dats? =P

Okay, trying to summarize what I've learned so far: There's basically
not functional difference between SEQ and PRG. _Programatically_
everything can be done with everyone. It's all _only_ about human
perception - correct?

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Jul 6 18:47:01 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-07-06 18:47:04 CEST