On 2012-06-27, at 12:51, Greg King wrote: >> What about using the much much much MUCH more common PRG for regular >> files instead of this USR thing? 99,999% of all real existing files >> can't be openned (without hacking in a change to use PRG) right now, >> at all. =) > > I prefer that the file-type would be specified only when a file is > openned for writing. It isn't needed for reading or appending. > > I think that "s", not "p", should be the default. It is DOS's default. > And, it is the "lowest common denominator". Only "random files" and > partitions aren't sequential (even REL actually is two sequential chains > tied together). Very well said. I very much second that. -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Jun 27 14:22:34 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-06-27 14:22:38 CEST