> The compiler can be fixed for the code shown above with not too much effort. > But the code you posted is a different thing, because it would be required to > move allocation of variables to the top of the function, and this doesn't > really fit into the compiler as it is now. Maybe I can at least make this an > error .. I have run into this, when I wrote my first cc65 program. If the compiler would simply issue an error for local block variables that's fine. I guess everybody can live with such a limitation, as long as it does not silently corrupt the C semantics. -- ---> Dirk Jagdmann ----> http://cubic.org/~doj -----> http://llg.cubic.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Apr 13 06:52:34 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-04-13 06:52:38 CEST