Hi! On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:34:28PM +0100, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > I was under the impression that the "BASIC stub" is obligatory - I'm > just no C64 guy, you see ;-) Not really. The cbm scene is dominated by the c64 scene, which in turn is dominated by people/literature/samples that uses "other" assemblers. These assemblers do usually always add the load address (since they mimic the behaviour of assembler running on the real machine), but never a BASIC header. This means that people are used to adding the BASIC header themselves (if necessary) but they're also used to not having to add the load address. As a consequence, ca65 not adding the load address is "bad" while ca65 not adding a BASIC header is expected behaviour. Interestingly the former is much easier to do manually than the latter, but that's how it is:-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Nov 5 13:26:14 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-11-05 13:26:18 CET