Re: [cc65] Problem with different behaviour of conio implementations

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2010-07-27 11:02:52
Hi!

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:55:29PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> Is the behaviour in that scenario defined/specified? 

I don't think so. Specifying what has to happen here would make the library
implementation larger, and I do assume that most output statements using conio
are preceeded by gotoxy() anyway.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue Jul 27 11:03:01 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-07-27 11:03:05 CEST