On 05/16/2010 08:57 PM, Groepaz wrote: > On Sonntag 16 Mai 2010, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: >> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Daniel Pralle wrote: >>>>> int foo; // declaration >>>>> foo = 1; // assignment >>>>> int bar; // ILLEGAL >>>> >>>> almost. this particular snippet would work just fine :o) >>> >>> What did i miss here? It doesn't compile with my cc65?!?!? >> >> You are right. It isn't valid C89. > > it is, i can't read. the second one looked like an initialized variable to me. > oh well :) > No problem. I think that happens after heavy use of Commodore computers, eh? ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun May 16 22:49:30 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-16 22:49:33 CEST