Re: Re: [cc65] array of pointers to functions question

From: Chiron Bramberger <chiron1bramberger.com>
Date: 2010-05-15 20:47:53
  
 Thanks! That's what I thought, but I wanted to make sure there
wasn't something else I was missing. :)
  I didn't want to post a general c programming question, I just
wanted to make sure there wasn't some particular thing about cc65 that
I wasn't getting. 
 Thanks again!
 On Sat 15/05/10  2:19 PM , "Mark J. Reed" markjreed@mail.com sent:
 On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Groepaz  wrote:
 >> int foo;  // declaration
 >> foo = 1;  // assignment
 >> int bar;  // ILLEGAL
 >
 > almost. this particular snippet would work just fine :o)
 Fair enough, especially since I used // comments.  Even with those
 turned into /* comments */, it wouldn't compile in strict C89,
though
 (e.g. gcc -Werror -std=c89 -pedantic).
 -- 
 Mark J. Reed 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 To unsubscribe from the list send mail to  with
 the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sat May 15 20:48:04 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-15 20:48:06 CEST