Hi! On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:04:13PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > - If Uz comes up in the near future with an improved semantics for > relative paths (as discussed in another thread) then all this stuff > will be unnecessary anyway :;-) Yes, I will probably change that. Hopefully next weekend ... > - If for some reson or another Uz doesn't do so then we'll just stick > to the plain ca65 for assembling. Thus we'll be back at -I for the > compiling and aseembling (and --bin-include-dir). My current plans are to add --bin-include-dir to the assembler and increase the magic behind -I so it will work for assembler files. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Tue May 4 22:16:14 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-04 22:16:16 CEST