Re: [cc65] --create-dep for ca65?

From: Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc1web.de>
Date: 2010-05-04 22:04:13
Hi,

> Now I looked into the docs this time and setting the line to something like:
>
> $(CC) -t $(CC65_TARGET) -c --create-dep $(@:.o=.d) --asm-include-dir $(SOURCEDIR) --asm-args --bin-include-dir,$(SOURCEDIR) $(ASFLAGS) -o $@ $<
>
> seem to solve the problem, while of obviously doesn't look too good...

I see and agree. Nevertheless I don't see this as an issue:

- If Uz comes up in the near future with an improved semantics for
relative paths (as discussed in another thread) then all this stuff
will be unnecessary anyway :;-)

- If for some reson or another Uz doesn't do so then we'll just stick
to the plain ca65 for assembling. Thus we'll be back at -I for the
compiling and aseembling (and --bin-include-dir).

Regards,
Oliver
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue May 4 22:04:21 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-04 22:04:24 CEST