On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 02:31:44PM +0200, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: > As far as I understand you, I believe this is fine. Since it is not > a dead-end, the "first make it work - then optimise" rule is IMHO to > follow. Ok. It's implemented as described in my last mail. There are now two options (--create-dep and --create-full-dep) in the compiler, assembler and the cl65 utility. For the compiler, --create-dep will leave out system includes (in angle brackets). For the assembler, --create-full-dep will add those files that came from debug info (which - in case of the C compiler - means also system include files). The cl65 utility will pass both options to both tools, but in case of the assembler only for files that were named on the command line, not for intermediate files generated by other tools. Please note that this changes the behaviour of --create-dep, it needs an argument now. If you don't change your makefiles, it will create dependency files with unexpected names:-) The changes are checked in and should be in the next snapshot. Please let me know if they work as expected or if there are any problems. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat May 1 16:55:09 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-01 16:55:11 CEST