On 2010-05-01, at 12:02, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > Looking at dependency file generation for the assembler ... > :-D > [...] > What I can do is: > > * Add --create-dep, which will generate a dependency file that > includes > all files touched by the assembler (main file, .include > and .incbin). > > * Add --create-full-dep which will work as above, but files from > debug > info are added. Please note that this list of files will also > contain > the C system includes! > > So --create-full-dep will work slightly different from the compiler > but I > think this is ok. There's still the option to add a method to pass > down > additional files from the compiler later. As far as I understand you, I believe this is fine. Since it is not a dead-end, the "first make it work - then optimise" rule is IMHO to follow. > Please note that above changes (options --create-dep and --create- > full-dep, > which are already implemented for the compiler) will mean that you > have to > change your makefiles, because the old --create-dep option had no > argument, > the output file name was auto generated. This is no longer true for > the new > options. The advantage is that the user is now in control of > extension and > path of the generated dependency file. ... and can easily emulate the old, autogenerated ones behaviour, I guess. All for! -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat May 1 14:31:58 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-01 14:32:00 CEST