Re: [cc65] Re: some patches

From: Aaron J. Grier <agrier1poofygoof.com>
Date: 2010-03-17 21:20:01
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:25:53PM +0100, Groepaz wrote:
> On Mittwoch 17 März 2010, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
> 
> > I do not expect all combinations to be built by default.  however,
> > if I configure with "--enable-ide64" and "--enable-selfmodifying" I
> > am asking for the above four combinations to be built.  adding
> > "--enable-con80" to the previous two, and I am asking for eight
> > combinations.
> 
> how exactly would that be different from building the libraries
> outside of the compiler sourcetree?

it would be building multiple libraries from a single sourcetree.  I am
assuming that there is a consensus to avoid juggling multiple source
trees.  this may be a faulty assumption.

> cc65 doesnt even have "configure" stuff btw, and thats a (very) good
> thing in my book.

I only bring up autotools for illustration purposes.  there is no need
for cc65 to use it.

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agrier@poofygoof.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Wed Mar 17 21:20:15 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-03-17 21:20:18 CET