Re: [cc65] Re: some patches

On 2010-03-17, at 19:53, Aaron J. Grier wrote:

> I do not expect all combinations to be built by default.  however,  
> if I
> configure with "--enable-ide64" and "--enable-selfmodifying" I am  
> asking
> for the above four combinations to be built.  adding "--enable- 
> con80" to
> the previous two, and I am asking for eight combinations.

I was thinking along similar lines when I was writing about  
conditional builds. But I guess the problem starts when e.g. two  
different options require modifications to the same modules. For  
example JiffyDOS (not sure if this is a good one) AND ide64 (which I  
would consider both to be "important") both would modify read.s and  
write.s. Then you have to say "either or", which means more logic to  
the building process and loss of the modularity goal we wanted to  
achieve. OR... maintaining an exponentially growing set of  
combinations of different read.s-es and write.s-es. The same for  
options modifying other source files. Too bad :-(

Having said that - I would still be happy to have at least the  
exclusive variations possible.

-- 
SD!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.