Good morning! On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:13:20PM -0500, Greg King wrote: > I am not happy about that! The compiler has "stolen" the ZEROPAGE > segment. When we want to do something in the zero-page, we are forced > to create special segments (and, invent names for them). I prefer that > it be the other way around. The compiler should have its > pseudo-registers in a special segment ("CC65ZP", perhaps). Then, we > assembly programmers can take advantage of CA65's easy-to-remember, > easy-to-summon, built-in .zeropage directive whenever we want to use the > zero-page! Typing .segment "EXTZP" instead of .zeropage when interfacing with C code won't kill anyone. Or will it? :-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 18 08:47:20 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-02-18 08:47:22 CET