From: "Ullrich von Bassewitz"; on Wed., Feb. 17, 2010; at 05:39 PM -0500 Subject: Re: [cc65] Customization of cc65 for new targets > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 08:53:51PM +0100, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > > If the guide targets not only bare-metal [or rather, > > bare-virtual-metal, in your case ;-)] developers, I'd really like > > to see the zero-page memory-area size reduced from $100 to $1A. > > $1A bytes is the minimum size in the standard configuration. Some > platforms have more than that space available, and use it for an EXTZP > segment. I am not happy about that! The compiler has "stolen" the ZEROPAGE segment. When we want to do something in the zero-page, we are forced to create special segments (and, invent names for them). I prefer that it be the other way around. The compiler should have its pseudo-registers in a special segment ("CC65ZP", perhaps). Then, we assembly programmers can take advantage of CA65's easy-to-remember, easy-to-summon, built-in .zeropage directive whenever we want to use the zero-page! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Feb 18 05:15:19 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-02-18 05:15:22 CET