> Your best chance is probably to write some sort of converter. If you > categorize the features of the different assemblers ("cheap symbols", > "scopes", "relocatable code", ...), you may even be able to make this > converter usable for lots of different targets. That would be the best and the most general solution, but also the most time consuming... The Mads assembler is pretty complicated to parse. Well... I think the easiest option for me is to compile the main program with CC65 with "holes" of predicted size, get the holes' addresses by symbols, then to compile the code with Mads on proper addresses. The final step will be to such two xex files. regards, Jakub ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Tue Dec 15 18:22:35 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-12-15 18:22:38 CET