On 2009-12-14, at 22:54, Mark Keates wrote: >> make some script that converts those assembler sources to work with ca65. > > In relation to this, from my point of view one of the plus points I found > when beginning to use the CC65 suite was the general notion that you do > not need to use an 'ORG' directive around your assembly code which gets > you thinking in terms of leaving this to the linker (which of course you > can control yourself through a config file). So although not having used > ORG myself my suspicion is that its use might not map directly over to CC65? To cc65 not, but it can be passed over to ca65. It has appropriate "compatibility" options. I had to go this route once, and it was possible without major changes in the original "ORGified" sources. So I would probably start with that. For further integration with cc65, adaptation of the particular sources on "as-needed" basis would have to be employed. -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Tue Dec 15 18:12:39 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-12-15 18:12:41 CET